a little bit of utopia
Sep. 27th, 2004 04:45 pmI finally figured out how to refer to my sexual orientation:
my-sexual
I've decided for a while now that it really doesn't matter what your sexual orientation is. Or rather, why should we have to label ourselves? One may be African, or Asian, or European, but we are first human. Isn't color-blindness preferential to affirmative action?
What's the point of labelling onesself as hetero-, homo- or bisexual? True, when one is hit on hit on by the gender they're less often attracted to, the person can spare the other's feelings by saying "sorry, but I'm not attracted to men/women". But in the end, isn't the point that you're not attracted to the person? Wouldn't it be better, to say "sorry, but I'm not attracted to you"?
I am not attracted only to men. I am not attracted only to women. I am not attracted equally to both.
I am attracted to whom I am attracted to.
In my own words, "I am my-sexual".
my-sexual
I've decided for a while now that it really doesn't matter what your sexual orientation is. Or rather, why should we have to label ourselves? One may be African, or Asian, or European, but we are first human. Isn't color-blindness preferential to affirmative action?
What's the point of labelling onesself as hetero-, homo- or bisexual? True, when one is hit on hit on by the gender they're less often attracted to, the person can spare the other's feelings by saying "sorry, but I'm not attracted to men/women". But in the end, isn't the point that you're not attracted to the person? Wouldn't it be better, to say "sorry, but I'm not attracted to you"?
I am not attracted only to men. I am not attracted only to women. I am not attracted equally to both.
I am attracted to whom I am attracted to.
In my own words, "I am my-sexual".
no subject
Date: 2004-09-27 02:52 pm (UTC)