*bites tongue*
This kind of stuff makes me sick to my stomach.
And the scariest part is, if I were a Christian, I think I'd try to make myself come to terms with the "truth" of the "evils" of homosexuality, since I don't believe in a-la-carte religion.
*goes to bed curled in a fetal position*
This kind of stuff makes me sick to my stomach.
And the scariest part is, if I were a Christian, I think I'd try to make myself come to terms with the "truth" of the "evils" of homosexuality, since I don't believe in a-la-carte religion.
*goes to bed curled in a fetal position*
no subject
Date: 2004-05-09 11:36 pm (UTC)I'm gonna quote Abby here: "Every time I start to think, 'What if this guy's right?' I realize that I can't believe that, because I can't believe in a god who would hate people."
no subject
Date: 2004-05-09 11:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-09 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 06:26 am (UTC)I am a Christian, and while I agree with parts of the cartoon, some of it's a little overreaching. I'm with you on the love the sinner part ;) First off, I think there's a distinction between temptation toward homosexuality and actually engaging in gay sex acts. Secondly, I don't consider gay sex to be any worse of a sin than lying, premarital sex, gossiping, etc. All of which I've done, so really, I can't claim to be any more moral than someone who has wholeheartedly embraced that kind of lifestyle, because for quite some time I was engaged in a lifestyle contrary to what God wanted, and I still screw up most of the time.
But, unlike psycho girl in the tract, I don't have a problem being friends with gays and lesbians (and bi kids, too), and I understand desire towards someone of the same sex, so, I guess the cartoon puts me off because it demonizes gay couples, and there's just no reason for it. All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, after all. The tract authors clearly forgot that the all includes them, and little children as well.
/rant
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 06:59 am (UTC)- Corey
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 11:14 am (UTC)Besides, I'm adopted, so the whole not being able to choose your family thing doesn't work at all for me ;) Best wishes.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 11:36 am (UTC)I agree that you definitely choose to act on such activities, but the attraction itself is not a choice. You don't choose to like males or females. It's something that is with you from the beginning. But I can agree that acting is a choice.
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 11:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 01:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 01:12 pm (UTC)Yep, all I'm saying is that people choose to act on things. That's the whole basis of sin. I don't think temptation is necessarily a sin (although dwelling on the temptation may be... I still haven't worked that one out yet), as Jesus himself was tempted. But yes, it's all in the choices we make. After all, I'm quite tempted to not go to work tonight and spend the evening getting drunk and celebrating being finished with undergrad. :D But I won't, because that wouldn't be the right thing to do. :P Even though it'd be really fun :D Maybe tomorrow.
Eh, anyway, I really am not big into discussing homosexuality and christianity- I get rather bored with it. God loves us all, even when we do make dumb choices, and He's always there for us, no matter who or what we're attracted to (mmm, sheep...). And that's about the whole of it, imho. Now, politics and religion shouldn't be mixed... so unlike most crazy evangelicals out there, I'm all about delegalizing marriage, making civil unions the norm (for everyone, no matter who they want to marry, gay, straight, cousins, whatever), and leaving marriage covenants to the church of the couple's church. If you can find a church to marry you (which you pretty much will), go for it :)
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 08:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 10:20 pm (UTC)Here are some Finnish "tracts" (what they call these religious comic books) just for you:
- This Was Your Life
- The Little Ghost
- The First Jaws
Now wasn't that fun, kiddies?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 10:30 pm (UTC)YOu arent on AIM by any chance, are you?
no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-11 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-05-10 10:17 pm (UTC)Firstly, it paints a picture of Christians that isn't true for the most part. I know plenty of Christians who don't believe a word of this awful tract, and I wouldn't call them any less devout or serious about their religion. And that's one reason why I won't allow something like this to make me start believing that all Christians are bad or that it's the wrong choice to accept Christianity as one's religion.
I myself am not Christian and I have the sort of values that allow me to accept homosexuality as valid, and so I find this particular tract especially laughable. In my opinion, sexuality itself isn't sinful, and homosexuality is just another aspect of this uniquely beautiful and human interaction. I also don't believe that homosexuality is a choice; just as we don't choose to be a certain race or have a certain hair color, our expression of sexuality is also not a choice. Why would one make a conscious choice to be something which is vilified by a large portion of society and put oneself in danger of harrassment, assault, or even in some severe cases, murder? People commit suicide because they're told time and time again they're making the wrong "choice", but they're unable to change how they feel. Trying to live a sham of heterosexuality is destructive, both to they psyche of the person trying to be something they are innately not, and to the militantly heterosexual members of society that begin to think that they are the default, correct, or "normal" ones.
I believe that Christianity is a religion of loving one's fellow human beings, and so I refuse to take this tract seriously because, rather than "loving the sinner, and hating the sin" the children in the comic are being fooled into hating their fellow human beings by the biblical vagueries included in the tract. This tract, reduced to its purest message, is one of hating a large group of fellow human beings, and should be taken as the author's personal opinion, not a representation of Christianity as a whole. This is a personal opinion of course, but I tend to take any biblical quotes with a grain of salt, since even though the bible it touted as the word of God, it was transcribed, translated, and edited by human hands which are imperfect and controlled by their own personal prejudices.
Anyway, it is in my personal code of morals not to purposely harm anyone, and so I can't really identify with the hateful message of this tract. Instead I just thank my lucky stars that the type of people who believe this thing are in the minority, and I pray all the time that logic will someday dawn on them that they really aren't following the tenets of the religion they purport to follow.
Anyway, Nastassja and friends, don't let yourself get too upset over the stuff this guy writes, because most of the info that he has is wrong wrong wrong (compare Jack Chick's inflammatory history of Halloween with an actual look at Halloween history from a reputable website, and even a look at Jack Chick himself and his rampant inaccuracies here). He's laughable and not worth getting yourself worked up over :)